Tolkien and the "Physical economy" of Post-menopausal Women
The world of Tolkien scholarship awaited
with bated breath the publication in early November of a much-expanded revised
edition of his selected letters, more than 40 years after the publication of
the original edition. While there has certainly not been sufficient time to
thoroughly digest the mass of new material (nor have I even attempted to read
the book cover to cover in the chaos of semester’s end), I stumbled upon one
particular new “gem,” a July 1940 letter to his middle son, Michael, that I
felt required immediate commentary, for myriad reasons. Not the least of which is
its honest portrayal of Tolkien as a middle-aged conservative male Catholic Oxford
don who, while occasionally demonstrating some open-mindedness concerning women
(including, arguably, some of his female characters), was no feminist. This
does not, however, in any way minimize or denigrate feminist readings of
Tolkien’s works, as authorial intent and reader reception are two very
distinct lenses through which to observe literary works. My purpose is likewise
not to pillory Tollers (although one might argue his views presented here
richly deserve it) but rather to demonstrate that, despite the beliefs of some
to the contrary, Tolkien was in many ways NOT ahead of this time. Nor should
anyone take this as an apology for his narrow-minded points of view as merely reflecting
the common misconceptions of his time (although I believe it is instructional
to show that, in many ways, they do just that). Tolkien’s views on and use of gender
in his writings are, as in the case of race, complicated, and while they
should be studied in the greater context of the man, his life, his times, and
the totality of his writings, we should not use any of these lenses to minimize
the fact that they are, in some circumstances, utterly cringeworthy.
The original edition of his selected
and abridged letters includes a 1941 epistle to Michael, concerning marriage
and relationships between men and women more broadly, infamous for a number of
cringeworthy statements whose interpretation has ranged from “conservative” to
“openly misogynistic,” depending on the point of view of the reader. While the
updated volume includes even more dubious nuggets from this letter (including
Tolkien’s view on the specific “courage” of women), what caught my eye was a
previously unpublished letter to Michael, designate 38a, also largely on the
topic of women and relationships with them. The letter begins with Tolkien
assuring his son that he has “never felt your love for A. ridiculous” (pg. 59),
followed by several rather endearing fatherly pieces of advice about not
rushing into things with his lady love.
Then the reader turns the page, and
Tolkien makes a veiled reference to a letter that Michael’s mother, Edith, had
written to her son. In explaining his wife’s apparently less than glowing
response, he notes that Michael is “now up against a fundamental difficulty of
life, which needs care and tact” (emphasis original). Yup, this
is going to be another one of THOSE letters. Tolkien explains (rather
condescendingly in my humble opinion) that women are “often far less
introspective than men, and apt to understand their own motives very little.”
Tolkien then proceeds to explain that since
sons are “peculiarly dear to mothers” they are often jealous of other women in
their sons' lives, although the majority are completely unaware of it. Tolkien
admits that he does not know what Edith had written to her son – therefore, a
wiser man might have stopped at saying “Mummy is frightfully fond of you, and
in constant thought of you, and feels deeply for your present hard life” (pg.
60), despite the fact that this sentence alone makes me wince (and he admits later in the letter that Edith was actually “quite reconciled” with
Michael’s romance [pg. 60]). But Tolkien being Tolkien, he goes there,
and goes there hard, and notes “several other considerations” that he feels
Michael should keep in mind when reflecting on whatever it was that she had
said to her son. Translation: “be nice to Mummy and don’t take seriously what
she said; she’s not responsible for being irrational, for the following
reasons.”
Sigh.
The reasons, in a nutshell, are as
follows (not in the order given):
1) Edith never got over having to convert
to Catholicism to marry Ronald, and it has made her “irritable” (pg. 60).
2) Edith had developed “neuritis” and
was “both in pain often, and physically irritable” (pg. 60).
And…
Yes, Edith has been going through the
“change of life” (pg. 60).
Over the next few sentences, we read
Tolkien’s description of menopause, replete with common misconceptions,
condescension, and just plain misogyny, delivered with all the confidence a middle-aged
cis-man who doesn’t even have a medical degree can muster when discussing a
cis-woman’s body. Apparently Edith had been in perimenopause/menopause for some
time, and was experiencing (undescribed) symptoms that were obvious to her
husband, leading him to label her experience – defined by him as when a woman
“ceases physically to be fit for childbearing” – as “slow and difficult” (pg.
60). This definition is curious – is it the natural process of physical changes
to her body (which heretofore he has not explained) that are “difficult” or the
adjustment to no longer being able to reproduce? The term “fit” here is
certainly loaded, for example having Darwinian implications. Before being
accused of reading too much into this, let us examine the remainder of this
sentence, in which Tolkien explains that the result for a woman is that “her
whole physical economy has to be readjusted” (pg 60). Yes, you read it
correctly – a woman’s physical value or capital (which “physical economy” is
code for) is defined by her ability to reproduce until menopause. What it is
afterwards is not here defined, but apparently largely consists of taking care
of Ronald, Priscilla (still a teenager) and the house, and, it is insinuated,
poking her nose into Michael’s personal life.
While it is not my intention to downplay the importance of childbearing for those for whom this is a life choice (not me!), or the overall essential nature of it for the propagation of our species, the idea that a woman’s “physical economy” is defined by her ability to reproduce at ANY stage of life is simply insulting, although not uncommon. As Mitteness (161) has documented concerning persistent depictions of menopause in the mid 20th century, the common image is that “it is a time of loss - of biological function and of social worth.” While Tolkien’s Catholicism potentially (probably?) plays a role in this point of view (given the Church’s view on procreation), the fact that he so cavalierly phases it this way is disturbing. Does he really believe that Edith measured her own worth solely (or even primarily) by her ability to produce four heirs? Would he have wanted her to feel that way? So many questions, most of them quite dark in nature.
But wait – it gets worse. Tolkien then
explains to his son, quite authoritatively, that menopause (or perhaps
specifically the change in their “physical economy” forced upon them) “makes
them nervously unstable; and often hardly accountable for their sudden
feelings” (pg. 60). Thankfully, Tolkien notes, these issues had apparently
begun to fade, only to be replaced with her neuritis. Interestingly, despite
Tolkien’s separation of his wife’s “change” and her nerves being “on a tingle” (possibly
just parroting what the family physician had told them), more recent studies
have demonstrated that such symptoms can be associated with physical changes in
menopause or post-menopause (Li et al. 1).
In summary, Tolkien tells his son to “forgive
and forget,” “Pray for her,” and “feel real affection for your mother (and my
sweetheart)” (pg. 60). While that last clause tugs at the heartstrings
(reminding one of the romantic vision of Ronald and Edith as Beren and Lúthien)
we should not overlook the fact that Edith is blatantly objectified, and
perhaps even infantilized, in this entire letter. The message is one of lack,
of diminution: pity Edith because she cannot help what has happened to her,
including her passage into a kind of death – the death of her primary physical
economy.
Before some well-meaning individual attempts to mansplain to me that
since Tolkien was talking to his SON it doesn’t count as mansplaining, consider
how it sounds to a cis-post-menopausal woman to read a cis-man’s confident
description of women’s bodies to his son, knowing that this conversation is
further propagating negative and perhaps dangerous misconceptions onto yet another
generation. Also consider what it means for Tolkien to hold ignorant opinions
concerning his own wife’s experience with this natural change in life. Finally,
realize the inherent commodification of the female body that Tolkien not only seems
to buy into wholesale here but is propagating as fact to his son.
In terms of Tolkien’s legendarium,
what examples do we have of post-menopausal women? In terms of the elves, he
notes in “The Laws and Customs Among the Eldar” in Morgoth’s Ring that,
despite their longeval nature, elves, like humans, primarily reproduce in their
relative youth; despite retaining the “power of generation” for as long as
needed, it is natural for them to no longer have such a desire after some time and
“the mind turns to other things” (MR 213). While we might consider this
very forward-thinking of Tolkien (to acknowledge that the time after
childbearing is natural and not to be considered as a lack but rather the
exertion of will), it comes in the same assemblage of writings in which we have
Fëanor’s mother, Míriel, will herself to die in an effort to maintain autonomy
over her own reproductive rights. There is also the unfortunate case of
Elrond’s wife, Celebrían, whose sole purpose in the narrative is to give him
three children; after being assaulted (perhaps even sexually assaulted) at the
hands of orcs, she is conveniently shipped oversea and out of the narrative.
In terms of mortals, we have the busybody nursemaid Ioreth (whose name
literally means “old woman” in Sindarin) and the foul-tempered, spoon-stealing
Lobelia Sackville-Baggins as our primary examples. In hindsight, a menopausal
reading of Lobelia might be very interesting indeed. If someone has written
that paper, please let me know – I’d love to read it! If no such paper exists,
someone has to write it.
Tolkien’s view of menopause certainly reflects the misconceptions of his day and, unfortunately, perhaps even times prior to his. In the Victorian era menopausal women were considered “emotionally unstable” a rather persistent and aggressive trope that is still widespread today (RCN). Physician Charles Meigs wrote to his students in 1848 that a menopausal woman only has the following to look forward to:
grey
hairs, wrinkles, the gradual decay of these physical and personal attractions,
which heretofore have commanded the flattering image of society...The pearls of
the mouth are become tarnished, the hay-like odor of the breath is gone, the
rose has vanished from the cheek, and the lily is no longer the vain rival of
the forehead or neck. The dance is preposterous, and the throat no longer
emulates the voice of the nightingale’. (Utian 75)
The last of these symptoms is perhaps
painfully symbolic to the reader of Tolkien.
Despite common stereotypes widely
propagated through memes and other attempts at humor, studies have shown that
the rates of reported depression, anxiety, and stress among menopausal women
are comparable to menstruating women of the same age. Reported symptoms of "fatigue, irritability, insomnia, and nervousness" may be caused by both hormonal changes and the general stresses related to aging, especially in a culture that devalues older women (JHM).
It is instructional to note that
hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms had begun by the time of Tolkien’s letter,
but was not yet widely available (Houck 351). The standard medical “treatment”
(if one could call it that) for troublesome menopausal symptoms was “reassurance”
– since it was believed that women (and clearly men) frequently acquired
misconceptions concerning menopause from their social networks, education was
considered the best treatment, along with sedatives as needed (Houck 351). Of
course, some of the "fatigue, irritability, insomnia, and nervousness" might have been caused by the actions of others in their lives (husbands, children, and even parents) adding stress to their lives: say, having two sons in the military during a war, or having a husband who had his own long-standing physical and psychological challenges, some related to his own war experience.
Since this is a discussion of Tolkien,
we should end with some philology. Another term for menopause is the climacteric,
thought to derive from the Greek for the steps of a ladder. As Wulf Utian
(74) mused, the widespread negative stereotypes of menopause persisting over the
20th century “make one wonder whether women were meant to be
climbing up or down the ladder!” Tolkien clearly seems to suggest the latter; I
vote for the former.
Houck, Judith A. (2002) “How to Treat
Menopausal Woman: A History, 1900 to 2000.” Current Women’s Health Reports
2: 349-55.
Johns Hopkins
Medicine (2023) “Introduction to Menopause.” https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/introduction-to-menopause
Li, Jiayu et al. (2023) “Association
of Reproductive Factors and Exogenous Hormone Use With Distal Polyneuropathy
Among Postmenopausal Women in the United States.” Scientific Reports 13:
9274. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-35934-7
Mitteness, Linda S. (1983) “Historical
Changes in Public Information About the Menopause.” Urban Anthropology
12(2): 161-79.
Royal College of
Nursing (2021) “The Wandering Womb: Women’s
Health Nursing Past and Present.” https://www.rcn.org.uk/library-exhibitions/Womens-health-wandering-womb
Utian, Wulf H. (1997) “Menopause – a
Modern Perspective From a Controversial History.” Maturitas 26: 73-82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512296010924
An excellent essay! I feared we’d find more dubious points of view in the Expanded Letters. A man on Quora once told me that I shouldn’t be irritated by that later letter to Michael. Of course, I replied that I have the right to be irritated by whatever I please. (He probably chalked it up to my female emotionality.)
ReplyDeleteCassandra, thanks for taking the time to comment. I fear you are correct on the last point.
DeleteJust in case you're interested, once upon a time I wrote an article about the Athrabeth arguing (among lots of other things) that Andreth is menopausal, and that this may have been intentional on Tolkien's part: "The Wise Woman's Gospel" (Renée Vink), to be found at Academia.edu.
ReplyDeleteThis letter adds fuel to my conviction that Tolkien was indeed thinking of the menopause while he wrote this dialogue. He may have been more understanding of it than you perceive him to be in this letter.
Renee - thanks for this reference! I look forward to reading this. I think if the reader reviews the letter and sees all of the comments I quoted in context it is fairly clear that at least in this letter Tolkien is voicing an opinion about women and menopause that is not positive (nor aligning it with wisdom).
DeleteTolkien uniformly uses "economy" in its sense of "management of resources" (as e.g. its use throughout "Letters" will show). It is simply tendentious to insist that Tolkien uncharacteristically uses it here mean "value or capital".
ReplyDelete"Aelfwine", I was not claiming this was a singular use of the term "physical economy," but rather an insulting one; in defining a woman's primary "management of resources" (if you want to use that particular wording) as mainly/most importantly (insert your favorite synonym here) procreation before menopause is insulting and limiting; but equally insulting is the idea that once a woman can no longer procreate that somehow the shift in "management of resources" is necessarily traumatic (whatever will she do? how will she define herself? what value can she possibly have?) .
DeleteI quite agree that it would be an awful thing to equate the "value" of women (or men) with their state of reproductive capability — which is precisely why you should make very certain you have understood correctly that someone means to do so before ascribing such a view to them (and the more so when you claim that what they have actually said is "code" for said awful thing). In fact, Tolkien here is saying NOT saying that. What he IS saying is simply that during menopause, a woman's body makes a reconfiguration of its resources (its "physical economy"), which is in fact an apt description in the hormonally-induced changes that her body undergoes at that time. We all experience such a hormonally-induced reconfiguration of our bodies and its resources during puberty and, less dramatically, later in life as we age and our hair goes gray (and in men often fall out), our bones become more brittle, our energy levels and (particularly in men) muscle-mass decrease, etc. etc. This is not controversial, and it has nothing to do with our "value" as human beings.
ReplyDelete“Aelfwine”, I find it interesting that you are ignoring the other misogynistic comments cited in the 1940 letter, comments which provide immediate context (in both time and space) for Tolkien’s use in that letter of the phrase whose interpretation you are debating. If one wants more context, please see the infamous March 6-8, 1941 letter, also to Michael, in which, among other cringeworthy things, Tolkien explains to his son how women can be motivated by the “sexual impulse” to “achieve very remarkable insight and understanding, even of things otherwise outside their natural range” when they are interested in a man (for example a male teacher) “for it is their gift to be receptive, stimulated, fertilized (in many other matters than the physical) by the male. Every teacher knows that” (Letters 68). Women are apparently naturally defined by their fertility in more than one epistolary conversation with his son Michael.
ReplyDeleteI also find your comments about mid-life physical changes in men a false equivalency, for several reasons. Ignoring the fact that women can also lose their hair at this time, “A decline in testosterone and symptoms that may arise are gradual compared to what women experience during menopause. ‘These midlife changes are often more subtle in men than in women,’ says Dr. [Luigi] Simone [of the Scribbs Clinic]. ‘Women experience a complete shutdown of ovarian hormone production at menopause. The decline in testosterone in men is slow.’” [https://www.scripps.org/news_items/4437-is-male-menopause-real ]. There is also the well-known fact that while menopause marks (by definition) the end of a woman’s natural fertility (outside of scientific intervention), many men remain naturally fertile until an advanced age. Please note that my comments are not meant to diminish or denigrate the real physical effects that any person experiences due to aging, but we should be precise when making comparisons. It was Tolkien himself, in this very letter, who defines the central point of this transition as when a woman “ceases physically to be fit for childbearing” – not when her hair turns grey, not when she is prone to osteoporosis, or she starts losing muscle mass. Again, fertility appears to be the defining factor.
Tolkien Studies is not a religion, and J.R.R. Tolkien was not a saint (although there is apparently a misguided group of individuals dedicated to having him canonized – I hope we can both agree THAT is cringeworthy!). As Dimitra Fimi, Edith Crowe, Robin Reid, and many other excellent scholars have pointed out, it is possible to acknowledge, call out, debate, and analyze Tolkien’s use of sexist and racist stereotypes and tropes and still admire both the man and his works. As an example, I hope you were able to catch Mercury Natis’s most excellent presentation on Tolkien and Jewish stereotypes and tropes at the Tolkien Society’s seminar this past weekend. If not, it will be posted on the TS YouTube channel soon.